How Psychological and Psychoanalytic Criticism Affect Lifestyle

The study of our mind and individual thinking is significant and directly connected with the study of works in literature. Although it may seem that they are two different branches of study, yet many research paper writings have claimed that it is essential for us to understand that in order to understand a work of literature in the true sense, we need first to understand human thinking patterns so that we can analyze the characters and also come close to the thinking of the writer of the particular piece of work. Psychological criticism deals with the work of literature primarily as an expression of the state of mind of an individual, in an indirect or fictional form, and for the understanding of the structure of the personality of the individual author.  This approach towards literature originated in the nineteenth century as a part of the Romantic replacement of earlier pragmatic and kinetic views by an expressive view of literature. Summing up all the arguments, we understand the importance of psychological criticism in the literary world. Since the work involves the brain, there are chances that students may require assignment help while working on the topic.  During the Romantic era, we find widely practiced all three necessary procedures based on the assumption that the form and details of a work of literature correlate with its author’s personality and emotional traits. These three critical procedures are: The reference to the personality of an author in order to interpret a literary work. The reference to literary works in order to biographically establish the personality of the author.  The mode of reading a literary work, especially to experience its author’s distinctive subjectivity or consciousness.  Since the 1920s, the widespread form of psychological criticism has been termed as Psychoanalytic criticism, the premises established by Sigmund Freud. Freud had developed a dynamic form of psychology, which he referred to as psychoanalysis, a procedure for analyzing and treating neuroses.  Freud expanded it to account for the many developments and practices in the history of civilization, including mythology, wars, religion, literature, and other arts.  The early twentieth century was gearing up for two of the deadliest wars of all time. The psychology of human beings had been drastically affected, and a turn was taken towards the hunt for individual identity. Among all this chaos, it became essential to convey to the world an exact situation. Literature, as it reflected society, did the same. Moreover, this type of criticism became essential to study literary works.  Freud briefly commented on the workings of the artist’s imagination at the end of his lecture on Introduction to Psychoanalysis, which he supplemented by relevant passages in other book lectures. This set up the framework for classical psychoanalytic criticism. He believed that all arts, including literature, like dreams and neurotic symptoms, consisted of fantasizing or imagined fulfillment of wishes that were either denied by reality or prohibited by the set social standards of morality.  The forbidden wishes come into conflict with the censor and are thus repressed by the latter into the unconscious realm of the artist’s mind. However, these are permitted to fantasize satisfaction in distorted forms that disguise their real motives and objects from the conscious mind.  Freud’s research paper writing claim that the chief mechanisms that impact these disguises of unconscious wishes are: The fusion of several unconscious elements into single entities and omitting parts of unconscious material. This is known as condensation. The substitution of an unconscious object of desire by one accepted by the conscious mind. This is known as displacement.  The representation of repressed, mainly sexual objects of desire by the nonsexual ones. Freud calls these disguised fantasies as manifest content of a dream or work of literature while the latent name content was given to the unconscious wishes that find a semblance of satisfaction in the disguised expression.  Freud also says that residual traces of the prior stages of psychosexual development are present in the consciousness of every individual. These traces are present from earliest infancy onwards and remain as a fixation in the unconscious mind of the adult. When an event is triggered in later life, this repressed wish is revived and motivates a fantasy, in a disguised form that the wish has already been granted in infancy.  Therefore, the chief enterprise of the Psychoanalytic critic is parallel with that of the Psychoanalytic therapist, and the former decipher the actual content of a literary work to explain its emotional effects on the readers.  Freud’s theory was also based on the concept of id, ego, and superego that he developed as a part of this theory on the mental structure. He said that the human mind has three structures- id, which incorporates

How Psychological and Psychoanalytic Criticism Affect Lifestyle

The study of our mind and individual thinking is significant and directly connected with the study of works in literature. Although it may seem that they are two different branches of study, yet many research paper writings have claimed that it is essential for us to understand that in order to understand a work of literature in the true sense, we need first to understand human thinking patterns so that we can analyze the characters and also come close to the thinking of the writer of the particular piece of work.

Psychological criticism deals with the work of literature primarily as an expression of the state of mind of an individual, in an indirect or fictional form, and for the understanding of the structure of the personality of the individual author. 

This approach towards literature originated in the nineteenth century as a part of the Romantic replacement of earlier pragmatic and kinetic views by an expressive view of literature. Summing up all the arguments, we understand the importance of psychological criticism in the literary world. Since the work involves the brain, there are chances that students may require assignment help while working on the topic. 

During the Romantic era, we find widely practiced all three necessary procedures based on the assumption that the form and details of a work of literature correlate with its author’s personality and emotional traits. These three critical procedures are:

  1. The reference to the personality of an author in order to interpret a literary work.
  2. The reference to literary works in order to biographically establish the personality of the author. 
  3. The mode of reading a literary work, especially to experience its author’s distinctive subjectivity or consciousness. 

Since the 1920s, the widespread form of psychological criticism has been termed as Psychoanalytic criticism, the premises established by Sigmund Freud. Freud had developed a dynamic form of psychology, which he referred to as psychoanalysis, a procedure for analyzing and treating neuroses. 

Freud expanded it to account for the many developments and practices in the history of civilization, including mythology, wars, religion, literature, and other arts. 

The early twentieth century was gearing up for two of the deadliest wars of all time. The psychology of human beings had been drastically affected, and a turn was taken towards the hunt for individual identity. Among all this chaos, it became essential to convey to the world an exact situation. Literature, as it reflected society, did the same. Moreover, this type of criticism became essential to study literary works. 

Freud briefly commented on the workings of the artist’s imagination at the end of his lecture on Introduction to Psychoanalysis, which he supplemented by relevant passages in other book lectures. This set up the framework for classical psychoanalytic criticism. He believed that all arts, including literature, like dreams and neurotic symptoms, consisted of fantasizing or imagined fulfillment of wishes that were either denied by reality or prohibited by the set social standards of morality. 

The forbidden wishes come into conflict with the censor and are thus repressed by the latter into the unconscious realm of the artist’s mind. However, these are permitted to fantasize satisfaction in distorted forms that disguise their real motives and objects from the conscious mind. 

Freud’s research paper writing claim that the chief mechanisms that impact these disguises of unconscious wishes are:

  1. The fusion of several unconscious elements into single entities and omitting parts of unconscious material. This is known as condensation.
  2. The substitution of an unconscious object of desire by one accepted by the conscious mind. This is known as displacement. 
  3. The representation of repressed, mainly sexual objects of desire by the nonsexual ones.

Freud calls these disguised fantasies as manifest content of a dream or work of literature while the latent name content was given to the unconscious wishes that find a semblance of satisfaction in the disguised expression. 

Freud also says that residual traces of the prior stages of psychosexual development are present in the consciousness of every individual. These traces are present from earliest infancy onwards and remain as a fixation in the unconscious mind of the adult. When an event is triggered in later life, this repressed wish is revived and motivates a fantasy, in a disguised form that the wish has already been granted in infancy. 

Therefore, the chief enterprise of the Psychoanalytic critic is parallel with that of the Psychoanalytic therapist, and the former decipher the actual content of a literary work to explain its emotional effects on the readers. 

Freud’s theory was also based on the concept of id, ego, and superego that he developed as a part of this theory on the mental structure. He said that the human mind has three structures- id, which incorporates the innate desires; superego, which represented saintly behavior- internalization of social standards of morality; and ego, which tries to strike a balance between the two mentioned aspects.

After that, Freud came up with the concept of the Oedipus Complex, which became a subject of various writings. The word represents the repressed but continuing presence in the consciousness of the adult, the male infant’s desire to possess his mother and be against his father. 

The word had been derived from the Greek tragedy by Sophocles, Oedipus the King, whose protagonist had unknowingly killed his father and married his mother. Various writers have widely used the concept of the Oedipus and Electra complex. 

Later, Freud also asserted that various insightful authors in Western literature anticipated many of his views. Therefore, these were a few points on the psychological and Psychoanalytic criticism that are sufficient to offer assignment help to students, hunting for the same.